In
anticipation of the three-day Independence Day break with multiple
opportunities for indulging in old car activities, I have spent several
hours each evening this week in my garage fiddling with my old cars.
Each
time I pull the dust covers back, I am struck anew by the design,
construction, and fine craftsmanship of the cars from the classic era that
I am so fortunate to have stashed away safely in my garage. I am
certainly not unique in that reaction – we’re in this hobby because we
appreciate those qualities of the classics. Each has been the subject of
countless articles and books; I would like to comment briefly on
construction.
A
few years ago, I got caught in a sudden violent wind storm in our modern
car. To protect the guilty, I’ll not further identify it. Suffice it to
say that it is a new-millennium vehicle of typical modern design and
construction. When the storm hit, visibility quickly dropped to zero, so
I pulled over to the side of the road. The trees overhead were whipping
back and forth, and I wondered if one would fall on me. Luckily, that
didn’t happen; a few small sticks bounced off the hood, though. It wasn’t
until later when the panic was over that I noticed the two dents in my
hood. It was over in a moment, but really, the sticks that hit the hood
were small, and I was surprised at the extent of damage they
caused. You may have already guessed that the hood is aluminum to save
weight.
Would that have happened in the same situation with one of my old cars? I
don’t think so, and I hope and pray to never be in a situation where that
assumption is put to test. The body is all steel, and of a more generous
gauge than is typical of today’s more “weight-efficient” designs. As you
may know, forming flat sheet metal into shapes stiffens it, so those
gorgeous, curvy, streamlined classic body shapes also had the practical
effect of making them stronger.
So,
here’s the question, strictly hypothetical: God forbid, but if there’s an
accident, do you think you’re better off in a big, strong, older car with
thick all-steel sheet metal, or your modern transportation appliance with
seemingly fragile aluminum hood? The correct answer is increasingly
clear; modern automobiles are infinitely safer in accidents than
our beloved collector cars. Videos of a test collision between a 1959
Chevrolet Bel Air and a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu have recently been making
the rounds on the Internet – judicious use of Google or an equivalent
Internet search engine will quickly find them. [See
it here - Webmaster] Even if you have already seen
them, they are worth another look, particularly if you missed the summary
at the end that indicates the driver of the 2009 Malibu might have
suffered a knee injury, but the driver of the ’59 would have died
instantly (again, it was a test, with instrumented test dummies, so nobody
was actually hurt).
I
feel very fortunate to have the opportunity to become familiar with modern
vehicle crashworthiness technology in my professional work (not
automobiles). Vehicle crashworthiness design, simulation, and test tools
available today were not even science fiction in the classic era. There
have been tremendous advances in the last ten, and even five years, and
that rapid pace of development promises to continue. Now if we could only
get them to work in a few those classic-era forms and shapes in the new
cars!
So
there you have it: beautiful, yes; crashworthy, not really. This is not
to discourage you from driving and enjoying your collector car during the
Independence Day holiday and throughout the summer show season. Just do
what you always do – drive safely!
There are many great events coming up: